Share on LinkedIn
Share on Xing

Why the evolution of AI needs to be fundamentally human-centric

Kenny MacIver — August 2017

Humankind needs to take decisive action to ensure the super-intelligent machines of the future are in its service, says AI professor Dr Franz Josef Radermacher — and not a threat to our very existence.

The human race is at a crossroads in its evolution, according to Dr Franz Josef Radermacher, professor for artificial intelligence at the University of Ulm and a co-founder of the eco-social initiative the Global Marshall Plan. The extraordinary breakthroughs in AI in recent years have given a glimpse of a world where super-smart devices will take over many of the economic activities currently undertaken by people. The change has also made real the possibility that digital intelligence will not just be the source for much broader automation but could even challenge the supremacy of humankind.

For Radermacher, this means it is time to start considering what kind of future we want to create in a world where robots will rival or surpass our reasoning and decision-making capabilities — and the role and power granted to such machines.

That will come down to some fundamental choices, he says. “The big question is whether we should develop artificial intelligence in a way that is human-centric, so that the whole design of those machines ensures they are orientated towards positive effects for humans. Or whether we build general-purpose systems that have an autonomy that could actually develop into something we didn’t intend.”

“The design of intelligent machines should not allow them to step outside the world of human-centric orientation.”

In his view, the risks associated with general-purpose intelligent machines, with the capacity to develop into something that is outside human understanding and control, are high. Recent media reports suggest such autonomous behavior was witnessed at Facebook’s AI lab. Researchers found that two AI chatbots, set up to engage in online trading, started bartering in a progressively divergent version of English. When the researchers realized this new dialect might become unintelligible, they shut down the rogue robots’ conversation.

Avoiding the creation of AI that is outside human control will require the design of new global governance structures, says Radermacher. Such mechanisms — assuming they could be agreed upon and enforced internationally — would mean that “whatever intelligent machines are developed, their design and programming would not allow them to take a step outside this world of human-centric orientation,” he says.  

That thinking is at least partially triggered by scenarios painted by some observers in which AI mounts an existential threat to humankind or is even seen as a natural, next evolutionary step.
Machine versus meat intelligence

On such points, Radermacher is sceptical. “Certain people like to speculate about some extreme possibilities for the future.  There are those who say humankind is only an intermediate step and that evolution only created us in order for us to create the ultimate intelligent living beings, before we just pass away.”  

The idea is that the “meat-based intelligence” of the human brain, as some observers characterize it, is only an intermediate step towards an electronics-based intelligence. But there is more to the argument than that, he says.

“Of course I can imagine that we might be able to build machines which, in many, many aspects, do perform much better than we do. They could live forever, they could easily modify their ‘brain,’ they could have much more energy, they wouldn’t have to sleep, they could explore outer space and so on. But I do not see any good argument as to why humankind should give up its dominant position to something we create.”

The point is that AI needs to be channelled in a way that is human-centric. And that means actively forging rules in the next few decades. “I would always try to see us building a world that is good for us, where we might have powerful machines but ones that are under our control, not machines that replace us.”

Photography by Enno Kapitza

First published
August 2017
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Xing
Dr Franz Josef Radermacher profile picture
About: Dr Franz Josef Radermacher
A German mathematician and economist with multiple doctorates to his name, Franz Josef Radermacher is professor of artificial intelligence at the University of Ulm and director of the Research Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing (FAW/n). A campaigner for a more positive future for humankind, he is a member of the global think tank the Club of Rome and a co-founder of the Global Marshall Plan movement, an eco-social initiative to rebalance global wealth while protecting natural resources.

Your choice regarding cookies on this site

Our website uses cookies for analytical purposes and to give you the best possible experience.

Click on Accept to agree or Preferences to view and choose your cookie settings.

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies are necessary in order to deliver the best user experience while others provide analytics or allow retargeting in order to display advertisements that are relevant to you.

For a full list of our cookies and how we use them, please visit our Cookie Policy

Essential Cookies

These cookies enable the website to function to the best of its ability and provide the best user experience for you. They can still be disabled via your browser settings.

Analytical Cookies

We use analytical cookies such as those used by Google Analytics to give us information about the way our users interact with - this helps us to make improvements to the site to enhance your experience.

For a full list of analytical cookies and how we use them, visit our Cookie Policy

Social Media Cookies

We use cookies that track visits from social media platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn - these cookies allow us to re-target users with relevant advertisements from

For a full list of social media cookies and how we use them, visit our Cookie Policy